Fix some grammar issues suggested by auto-correction tools.

This commit is contained in:
Ondrej Kozina
2024-01-15 12:30:20 +01:00
parent ebca40640d
commit 605acab31a

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Why
~~~
LUKS2 format keeps two identical copies of metadata stored consecutively
at the head of metadata device (file or bdev). The metadata
at the head of the metadata device (file or bdev). The metadata
area (both copies) must be updated in a single atomic operation to avoid
header corruption during concurrent write.
@@ -15,17 +15,17 @@ locking with legacy format was not so obvious as it is with the LUKSv2 format.
With LUKS2 the boundary between read-only and read-write is blurry and what
used to be the exclusively read-only operation (i.e., cryptsetup open command) may
easily become read-update operation silently without user's knowledge.
Major feature of LUKS2 format is resilience against accidental
easily become read-update operation silently without the user's knowledge.
A major feature of the LUKS2 format is resilience against accidental
corruption of metadata (i.e., partial header overwrite by parted or cfdisk
while creating partition on mistaken block device).
Such header corruption is detected early on header read and auto-recovery
while creating a partition on a mistaken block device).
Such header corruption is detected early on the header read and the auto-recovery
procedure takes place (the corrupted header with checksum mismatch is being
replaced by the secondary one if that one is intact).
On current Linux systems header load operation may be triggered without user
direct intervention for example by udev rule or from systemd service.
Such clash of header read and auto-recovery procedure could have severe
consequences with the worst case of having LUKS2 device unaccessible or being
On current Linux systems header load operation may be triggered without the user
direct intervention for example by an udev rule or from a systemd service.
Such a clash of header read and auto-recovery procedure could have severe
consequences with the worst case of having a LUKS2 device inaccessible or being
broken beyond repair.
The whole locking of LUKSv2 device headers split into two categories depending
@@ -36,17 +36,17 @@ I) block device
We perform flock() on file descriptors of files stored in a private
directory (by default /run/lock/cryptsetup). The file name is derived
from major:minor couple of affected block device. Note we recommend
that access to private locking directory is supposed to be limited
to superuser only. For this method to work the distribution needs
from major:minor couple of the affected block device. Note we recommend
that access to the private locking directory is supposed to be limited
to the superuser only. For this method to work the distribution needs
to install the locking directory with appropriate access rights.
II) regular files
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
First notable difference between headers stored in a file
A first notable difference between headers stored in a file
vs. headers stored in a block device is that headers in a file may be
manipulated by the regular user unlike headers on block devices. Therefore
manipulated by the regular user, unlike headers on block devices. Therefore
we perform flock() protection on file with the luks2 header directly.
Limitations
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ while locking is enabled.
We do not suppress any other negative effect that two or more concurrent
writers of the same header may cause.
b) The locking is not cluster aware in any way.
b) The locking is not cluster-aware in any way.
Additional LUKS2 locks
======================