a note about license, and testing "extends PSketch"

This commit is contained in:
Ben Fry
2021-06-23 08:29:55 -04:00
parent 225f6efc62
commit 26f01a539f
4 changed files with 14 additions and 6 deletions
+1
View File
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ import processing.opengl.*;
* than working around legacy Java code.
*/
public class PApplet implements PConstants {
//public class PApplet extends PSketch { // possible in the next alpha
/** Full name of the Java version (i.e. 1.5.0_11). */
static public final String javaVersionName =
System.getProperty("java.version");
+6
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
package processing.core;
public class PSketch implements PConstants {
// this is a dummy class
}
+2
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
1274 (4.0a5)
X do a test to see if PApplet extends PSketch breaks libraries
X seems to be working
regressions
+5 -6
View File
@@ -104,8 +104,6 @@ _ https://github.com/processing/processing4/issues/177
_ confirmed not working from Sam's repo either
_ do a test to see if PApplet extends PSketch breaks libraries
_ lots more cleanup to do in javafx/build.xml
_ remove the PDE classpath from sketches
@@ -192,6 +190,11 @@ _ https://github.com/processing/processing/pull/6048
_ add language support to Modes (request from Andres)
_ https://github.com/processing/processing4/pull/14
_ this was a small change; rebase not really needed since needs rewrite anyway
_ change the license from GPL
_ then pass through the source to update licenses
_ add Processing Foundation as 2012-15
_ update license info to state gplv2 not v3
_ run through that online license checker
discuss with Sam
@@ -477,10 +480,6 @@ _ break out Mode-specific options to their own panels in prefs
_ Mode should just provide a panel for their prefs
_ make the build fail if git pull on processing-docs fails
_ remove "save before running" message
_ pass through the source to update licenses
_ add Processing Foundation as 2012-15
_ update license info to state gplv2 not v3
_ run through that online license checker
_ save() and saveAs() need to be refactored
_ https://github.com/processing/processing/issues/3843
_ clean out the repo