eessppeelllloo/processing4
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/processing/processing4.git synced 2026-06-16 04:26:26 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

notes about platform issues resolved/implemented earlier today

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ben Fry
2022-01-22 21:24:13 -05:00
parent a48191536f
commit 43036bd4db
1 changed files with 15 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
todo.txt
+15 -12
View File
@@ -30,8 +30,20 @@ X fixed with https://github.com/processing/processing4/commit/1a49263a94a2d7af
platforms/variants/export
X replacing macosx with macos in prefs and languages
X major rewrite of Export to Application for the six supported platforms
_ now writes folders with different names instead of 'application.'
X now writes folders with different names instead of 'application.'
X move build/macosx to build/macos and make other necessary changes
X final supported platforms
X as far as adoptium is concerned:
X macos-x64, macos-aarch64 (m1), windows-x64, linux-x64, linux-arm32 (rpi)
X release files: macosx -> macos, linux64 -> linux, windows64 -> windows
X or macos-intel64, macos-applesi, linux-intel64, ...
X what should macos-aarch64 be called?
X Export Application can use nicer names, the libs thing is trickier
o macosx vs macosx64 in JavaFX
o the latter is making the export fail because it won't embed a Java VM
o may be because it's exporting twice and overwriting?
o or 64 takes precedence?
X doesn't matter with things being redone
windows scaling
X Fix "Could not delete disable_hidpi" message on macOS/Linux after closing prefs
@@ -253,17 +265,8 @@ _ or at least avoid the multiple
platforms
_ https://github.com/processing/processing4/wiki/Supported-Platforms
_ final supported platforms
_ as far as adoptium is concerned:
_ macos-x64, macos-aarch64 (m1), windows-x64, linux-x64, linux-arm32 (rpi)
_ release files: macosx -> macos, linux64 -> linux, windows64 -> windows
_ or macos-intel64, macos-applesi, linux-intel64, ...
_ what should macos-aarch64 be called?
_ macosx vs macosx64 in JavaFX
_ the latter is making the export fail because it won't embed a Java VM
_ may be because it's exporting twice and overwriting?
_ or 64 takes precedence?
_ Export Application can use nicer names, the libs thing is trickier
_ update JavaFX to use the supported platforms
_ update Video library to use the new layout
decisions before final 4.0 release